Cinematicity

film & culture

The duchess, a Supremely Beautiful Movie

Second-Rate Historical drama Delivers Serious Bang for the Dollar Value of Knightly's SMILE.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Second-Rate Historical drama Delivers Serious Bang for the Dollar Value of Knightly's SMILE.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This is FOR SURE Keira Knightly's best role and also the same could be said for the unusual personality of Ralph Fiennes(who does a bang-up job of holding fast to the single real claim on a counter-masculinity I have yet seen portrayed on the cinema screen).

SO: of the many PERIOD DRAMAs that Keira Knightly has put together with the help of her assented-role of monarch-in-dramaROLEAloneNOT(but seriously, a person with clear royal loyalties and assistance patterns that make her seem WAY WAY WAAAAAAY beyond the pale of ordinary living standards that Mark Wallberg could only fathom from the outside of the image that he pretends to make the same type of act out of his fashionable relationship to the sexorGENdERr they recommend others of the same pheno-type embrace and accordingly adopt seriously sounding attitudes to life that make the person that adopts them sound as if they had experience of some kind or another with ACTUAL affairs in the world which is the epitome of the cinematic relationship between humanBeINGs and the on-screen adoptive representationalities of their roleMAKING with regard to the non-sense of life that makes most of these concerns with actual animus seem retarded to most people.) Kiera Knightly rises to the full importance of her role and import of her subsidy to people affected by the malaise of the present historical juncture that finds absolutely no female type that is interesting to portray in a world so totally devoid of responsible actors it is no longer conceivable that within the world of the present modernity there is any way or means at all to effectuate a meaningful moral and value-based life based in the abilities of human being to REASON their way through life with regard to others that aren't there just plainly obstructing your right of way through it and making every single thing in life so uncool you wouldn't believe it if somebody tried to convince you this place was a reality one is being forced to endure until this life ends because it will and what comes next is not the least interesting but it is also one that REQUIRES PREPARATION FOR should one even WANT TO proceed beyond immortality to full human granting of eternal life which is a serious non-consideration for almost everyone on PLANETOID EARTH but the present author that has a total exemption on making ANY SENSE ANY LONGER UNLESS YOU keep*struggling with these long sentences and oblique thinking I can barely care to fix and rewrite again thinking in 2025 is no small feat and matters not if I do it better for you(...that is to say, a world so devoid of responsible actors besides Hugh Grant and a handful of barely three other people on Earth that this VERY EXPERIENCED PERSON IS quite*clearly*conscious of in her WORK on WOMANhooding BEAUTY AND beautiful women into lives that have meaning to them outside and beyond their simple aesthetical reactions to perfect image quality in a person that makes it clear YOU ARE BETTER LOOKING THAN THEY AND that is ****what transcribes the truth of women" that try to dare approach femininity as if it were a quantum of control mechanisms over men involving OVERT MACHINATIONS)...

Which is that it is to say(since that is a really hard and long-developing thought that results in a total existential-phenomenological display of some mode of existing as a human-being....): when faced with random encounters that require choice about how one needs to act it is ALWAYS THE CASE that the real approach is to throw oneself repeatedly into a new and novel-seeming situation until they get the picture with what it is that is required of a person(should they be capable interested and capable of even understanding it at all vis a vi their own endowments and cool-accessabilities writ larger than a sandwich for another person's respect matrix) rather than expect there is a pre-existing model for action that will assuredly DELIVER maximum cool-effect and perceptibleknowledge in other people(which IS THE FULL HUMOUR OF THE Cohens in fact, something that MarkyMark actually at one moment during Scorcese's The Departed actually kind a understood he said to Scorcese that he wasn't too clear about the gender-roles he was telegraphing to the world and Scorcese just said you must be fucking mentally-retarded if you don't even understand anything about the type guy you are masquerading around in public, my friend, because it is so straight and dope not a bit of uncool at all you'd be hard-pressed to imagine there is a single person like you on this earth my MAN"""" BUT THEN Scorcese just realized this is fucking normal brain in Americans they really think they're as cool as this fucking mental patient in front of me that can't even read the fucking lines I gave him he's so goddamn retarded he can hardly hold a thought about anything for a milljoule of energy he isn't wondering HOW DO I LAND A PUSSY RIGHT THIS MINUTE???!!!)! So, to refer back the previous essay(although it's really a parody of one, in the intellectual style most people take for random ranting but that here contains the full seeds of TOTAL TRUTH), when Mark Wahlberg is said to be an 'iconograph' it means there a time dimension to the changing nature of the representation for behaviour he idealizes in his performances and that telegraphs a new means of adopting it for oneself that puts one into relationship with a culture one can* perform by revealing WHAT IT IS actually*in the PRESENT that is NEW CULTURE at all since prior to that understanding it just seemed like it was all "played out" is precisely what Marky Mark would for sure say about the present moment itself he just doesn't see AT ALL WHAT THERE IS FOR A GUY TO care about in life any longer....So, returning to THE DUCHESS AND KEIRA KNIGHTLY IN A subsequent post, because this is a good, short, rejoinder to what has previously been written here(and this may no longer simply take the approach of writing essays since they are actually a bit out-dated at this point in history, particularly when nobody is paid or cares to purchase other people's writing in the mode in which it needs to be written for such consumption to be likewise to film,something that people will act-on when they take it seriously as a formatting-deviation that telegraphs the next cool-transformation in textual communication): Marky Mark and his Funky Bunch approach to masculinity is the contra-positive negative versioning of a stupid motherfucker for the present that Keira Knightly DESPERATELY avoids with all her heart except in the Pirates of the Caribbean where she is the most affable person that she actually is because she is a wonderful woman in all regards plain to say and there's very little more to say in CONCEPT-form about Keira's cinemographical interpretationalism of the present demands on an actor of their respective gender vis a vi what a girl(or boy) needs to learn vis a vi accepting the world and finding a path through it as it is or(in Keira's case) transforming the present into the past(to find ways and means of proceeding forthwith through it(as a functioning ADULT, not some plebian BORE)).