There is no better way to consider this film*
than according to the hair-styling and prolific access to the actually-maintained historical period*
in which this depictedly TREASONOUS represented story is maintained to have OSTENSIBLY occurred.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The Young Victoria(2009), An absolutely terrible film(and I say film here because it is 100% consistent with presenting its reasonless approach to the monarchy as if it did actually exist in the past in this way(which is, further, why what it DOES present is actually treason in that it pantomimes usurpation of the dignity of the QUEEN VICTORIA MONARCHY(and, by extension, postures as if it were*
the nobility of the present that could swear an oath****
in public to the Crown or declare itself the queen in public in a movie, both of which, since this is a FILM THAT PANTOMIMES REALITY(which is fraud in the strictest sense in total ignoramity of all that is sacred and lawful with regard to respecting the CROWN, its treated subject), these which are executionable crimes against the BRITISH STATE)(and what makes you cringe at the thought that Monarchs are comprised of nothing more than the noblestIGNOBILity of the commonest people ever to exist on this earth(i.e., 2009 rabble made-up as coiffured monarchers) that in due fact are indicative of the placative affairing of the actual British Monarch that not only tolerates this pablum but, in actual fact with the Victoria reign, began to think of the Monarchy itself as a public-facting"quote "JOB"("let's go to the Highlands; "Sorry, I have to work in 3-days time my dearest obsequious piece of fucking garbage!") of which this is really historical revisionism of the completed nature of this procedure that has in fact produced a monarchy with so little actual concern for reality as it stands that it can sit-around and watch navel-gazing films""""like this and think it is the open-ended further elaboration of its concept for REIGNING across its public(as if people actually gave a shit if the Queen Elizabeth miscreant thing was always and forever concerning with 'her' subjects 'cause she bankrolls a film in 2009 with such espoused social-considerations(not concerns as most imbeciles would call them, which the queen got correct that part and correctly stated as truth when in actual fact she never was never will be and never could have been concerned as such because she is frivolity itself in a mannequin costume, which is precisely what this film dressed"quote to a 'T' with its lead role cause Blunt embodies*
to such a full-extent the working-class person she is(and Emily Blunt really*
has absolutely no fucking business being in this film she is busted leather on this concept, just buck-teeth and fuckin' stroppy-spoiled-shiteating lips moronic laisse-faire skipping through scenes as if she COULD PANTOMIME ROYAL disposition on those ridiculous traits alone NOT but on her lostness and present-day-originating confidence in her moronic-imbecile personality conducting one's-self in a matrix of weath one never really could comprehend(as Blunt and Cruise1 likewise did not understand it actually but took the point of the film to completion rather than the shared-understanding that the past was SO MUCH COOLER THAN THE PRESENT PABLUM OF human-rights concern-based affairing of the global-economy as if it were a block of shit to steward through eternity forever on such blaisse people you couldn't have manufactured a MONAR ck of shit stain more or less amenable to technologification that these people truly are as de facto scum-bags across any and all tresspass on the dignity of ABSOLUTE-EQUALITY-ACROSS THE entire*
PLANET(as if it makes any difference to people wherever they may be They Have ZERO RECOURSE TO These (l)iving (s)tandards (and never had any in all of history) and what was shall also never be again just because it can be RENOVATED TO more TECH-FRIENDLY LEVELS and, inch by inch become a shattered-gloss of what it used to be because, as anyone who has visited VICTORIA PARK may know or marvelled at how dilapidated Russian open-air museums are in actual FACT, *
THE DILAPIDED CONDITION OF IT*
in fact, THAT IS HOW an historical epoch must be preserved as untouched****
(which no mother-fucking person of POWER in this world except Vladimir Putin if you can believe it understands at a phenomenological level what WORTHLESS GARBAGE American 'museums' are thay are all just fabricated virtual-reality concepts of some piece of shit Americanized-politico).
......But all this makes it clear to the KEEN OBSERVER how moronic the actual ROyaL FamLY must have gotten to grant this kind of access to a shittyTrash Movie. Nobody in 2025 can believe it's any longer credible to mire themselves in the rabble with any belief that they are going to invent our way out of the morasse of sameness and sultifying imprisonment in the endlessly reified present"(which is really a past-epoch that never existed which is that we*
have perfected the world and now live in its finalized status as a placeholder for same-shit-as-it-always-was...), and the fact the Royal Assemblage of peons thought this is testimony that THEY STILL THINK THEY CAN HAVE their***
cake and eat it with the common folk as a misdirect on their true loyalties IS, at this point, indicative of the fact******
that*they are nothing more than precisely this pretense to HUMANITY :-)(which is a big fat L.O.L.).
In any case, that's what there is to get from this film: unfettered views into an historical epoch in which shit mattered a great deal more than it does today; and that goes also for the gender-stereotyoping of men that require a COIFF(of which this film is AN AMAZING TESTIMONY of absolute truth on hairdressing MEN into something far more dignified that whatever the fuck a 'hair-cut' might be) as well as the endless arrays of bespoke-created art-objects that 'decorate'(in your dreams, 'cause this belies a seriously profound commentary on the relationship between civilization as a normative concept and the ability to GAZE upon the handiwork of mankind as if it were ITSELF testament to the glory of GOD HIMself as if it wasn't possible to make things of such fine quality without divine intercendence(which is only what a person can think about these kinds of unsurpassably amazingly beautiful things with which not only these gloryous PALaSeS are 'furnished' but also of what stuff the palaces themselves are manufactured not to be just living quarters but, in conformation with all that can be bespoke made to tailor-suit a place to its OWNER, a truly divine expression of the individualism of preference as it becomes a testamony of one's own having made a total home for themselves in the world in every conceivable way, which is what NOTHING BUT tech-scum in 2025 can attest to having done and their version is: "EVERYTHING IS GARBAGE.[full-stop!]")))).
Footnotes
Until this film put Blunt(her self-same majesty who is barely a woman and almost really a man that masks the identity of her actual faithless concern for women by her stomping around the globe as if women had won the war on manhood) and CRUISERboy(who has become, likewise, nothing more than a placeholder for masculinity bullshit in 2023 after he forsook it all after 'wrapping' Top Gun:Maverick) together in 'the thick of the shit here boysz'(which is to say, the Americanized disrespectful-cool-allure-oftheSELFMADEIconograph of the peasant through historical life as if they made some kind of lasting impression on the world, which they have not and never will at this point the communist crusade is basically played-out now.). ↩