CINEMAticITy

the PULP FICTION corner.

Lady Gaga. The FANTASY-of-theOrdinary.

what this video, for Tom! is all about, actually(cause most every soul watched it? Simply, needs, to, know"is Gaga all fuckin'that)? The fact, though? Lady is performing Italian opera for a society got Zero bus. getting thaet which is a tryhard to be something can never work for America(but evokes b

by

what this video, for Tom! is all about, actually(cause most every soul watched it? Simply, needs, to, know"is Gaga all fuckin'that)? The fact, though? Lady is performing Italian opera for a society got Zero bus. getting thaet which is a tryhard to be something can never work for America(but evokes but her middle-class/bourgeois entitled life, seriously she is a bit that plain-lookerin', yes, that high school chick)(: however, here, she goes fantastical! on this point(her ageing piano-hands, e.g. evoke this fully for her performance of this act), which is, ACTUALLY, about the most stand-up fuckin' thing a woman could do for women, generally. And, for loser men on this 'blonde look'(: guess, what, her message is simple, and it's must be just that that look, itself, is a costume of sorts she's NAILED so you can get to who she may actually be as a person adorned in its magical referentiality, b.s. though it may be to many!, which does seem to not just be a washed up middle class daddy's political item tryin hard to be European Italian diva for nothing but that sake(which means she's no dummy and, yet, it's certainly got to be the epic scale of the film! would ever give such a pop-star's presumed absolute narcissim license to even allow her self any such real-life documentation) about such a reformed Act of diva ness .....).

So, credit to her and to Tom Cruise in Top Gun: Maverick, it IS THE SIMPLE BEST *shit(film/eroo?1( ever. And while one may wonder from whence it came, they cannot actually answer it with: "the Central Moron Agency". One must, in fact, concede it to an artist's actual free-work, delusional as it must be, and howsoever one such may ever have had any belief in ANYTHING AMERICAN backthen, in 2017, of such enduring and fundamentally American significance.

One does suppose,though, that Cruise lives a sort of 'spatial life' in the 1990s, refusing to admit the intrusion of what the world actually is. which gets this done, in fact, for any artist. That is re-ligio. Latin for relinking-to-the-past of fidelity to the present of persistant humanity's 'enclosuring", itself(as Hannah Arendt argued in her book On Revolution for us all to throw off the shackles of modernity's false lure that novelty itself is the one and only 'hook'), and, in so doing, drive a mack truck through the so called rep-space with this movie that Gaga herself was willing and ABLE TO REINFORCe with her music video barely anybody would believe any woman would ever sing to any guy but a Tom Cruiser.

But, Fair Enough in AMERICa: one does need to rate. But, you know what Lady fucker??? WHAT YERPOINTIN TO IN THE FUCKIN SKY THERE IS YOUR OWN FUCKIN vanity bitch so try sohard sotry sohard so hard, bye-bye. THAT! ain't getin' fuck all done. And neither is the military placeholder this entire masquerade is closed up inside but is NOT ACTUAL THE ISSUE AT PLAY FOR HOWEVER THAT MIGHT BE and as annoying as it is to de-venerate the clearly not ostensible 'abilities' of the LockheedMartin DeskJockies 'encased' in these machines.

footnote

  1. Best FILM attempted: Out of Africa; Best Film of ALL TIME Oppenheimer(which Nolan MOST CERTAINLY did not attempt* to make(.. cause Chris! models his films he calls em off Superman 1978, which is worse literally thaen watchin' paint dry, so I guess he sped the tempo up a bit but that shit is not film asswipes its actually so lame its hard to imagine a more PREPOSTEROUS premise for a film career.

CINEMAticITy

the PULP FICTION corner.

Leo Tolstoy's NOVELLA! is not your PLOTWRITER MORONS

Where, in this, vast and Epic NOVEL IS THE perfected description, of, Anna Karenina I submit the page as well as the sentence:::::"You've missed the best aria", she said, to Vronsky, he thought, ironically. And if you want to Comprehend how Vronsky can begin to LOATHE HER unnatural beauty, as she sa

by

Where, in this, vast and Epic NOVEL IS THE perfected description, of, Anna Karenina I submit the page as well as the sentence:::::"You've missed the best aria", she said, to Vronsky, he thought, ironically. And if you want to Comprehend how Vronsky can begin to LOATHE HER unnatural beauty, as she sat in her opera 'box', you must COMPREHEND that this is the finest work of art in human history, period. That description, was from MEMORY, i leave you all to sort the numbers.

[I, personally, can quibble with Tolstoy's REFORMIST attitude towards the Church in his country(his writing ON that topic(his confession!) are nothing less than Stellar, and he does make much, as Augustine did, of things one ought not expect much from; But, thanks to them , one CAN now make sense, of, for instance the notion of a "Holy Ghost"; and, also, from Tolstoy, Jesus' possible rancorous attitude towards disbelievers he makes comedy of it in his novel on "Religion"); but, however, I do also quibble with his economic theory on serfdom-life, which is a nice historical predecessor to COMMUNISM ITSELF, ranshackled of its religious innate natural decency, and wired to no compulsion towards betterment broadly comprehended anyone wanting a nobel in such theories should countenace seriosuly(e.g., these serfs need not SHARE PROFIT, but rent the land and tithe part of their interest to the landowner as Adam Smith knew........).].

Did Leo have 'help' to write! his first paragraph? You decide; I can say, however, he wrote for a very vaunted group of studious ly interested people; and he did so, as one could only HAVE DONE SO, at the, time, from a position of SERIOUS ALIENATION . TO WHOM HE XOULD peove! he was the fuckin' A master. Period, bub./

"it was clear, she(Anna baby) was a woman in love.....the way she addressed Vevlovky in this tone of ANGRY-FRIENDLINESS............... ..".....

So:
This Author Does Not like anyone !!!!!?thaet does not LIKE Ingmar Bergman, if you dont like him, I say::::;You Are UNLIKEABLE PERIOD, you fuckin worthless LOSER probably can drink the frame sandwiched VOMIT off Nolan'$ Superman fake tard ed assswipe filmschool picturesque night ware off whatever shitty cul de sac that fag is living on over there in Wales retarded fuckin inbred paranoia land if Gene HACKMAN?! holey shit, doesn't piss it all over your face anyway with GEORGE LUKA'S'$ space symphony

montaging the stupidest country on the earth in that year?????Yeah, i definitely busted no nuts on that montage-minute saving every single stupid shit white gentrifyer line-item, he finally gave Plato's Republic of know-absafuckinlutely nuthin' father's lololol, whoever the fuck directed that pile of shit Chris Reeves knew was so bad, he must've thought he was actually Superman. So, yeah: watch whatever the fuck Bergman pointed his camera on, I wouldn't doubt hedid film drying paint for Chris Reeves to search for his super fuckin duper in it that's even fuckin* Brando could search out😂 his own! super fly in a GENERAL PATTON????? holey fuckin shit, this movie is so fuckin stupid I'm sure the celluloid got even dragged through someone's asscrack not really any trickery left to lay on the IDIOT COUNTRY made this fuckin shit over exposed to draw them to heaven????, you know Chris Nolan??!, you are NOT a Steamer / you gotSO LUCKY with your Digital edit transformong the actual 70mil PRINT CAUSE THE ALTERNATE DIG., sorry, is just sloppy trash, you fuckin' loser copy righting this total garbage dumpster culture wheel and steal, yer WW ii flick, Chris??????? Sticks in my mind like shitabout:::::(here, peepsz🤣🤣, the opening credits, already dead on arrival, Reeves)