”I don’t really know about that? I’m pretty sure I can’t weigh on it one way or another; I mean, it does seem like he has a RIGHTto do that thing that way; and: who am I to intervene on it.”xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thus is naturally usually spoken the Open Door Policy of Liberalism itself, that which to a great extent has split this world to pieces in every direction on the presumption that this ‘safeguards’ ‘freedom’, as it is conceived of by these people in any case. And that is also, further, to say: they view it as the deferentiality—absolute, deferentiality--of authority which, because it exists between an in-group clique of like-minded and dumb-founded aspirants on furthering their economic incentives, takes on the character of permission(and not a single thing more than that really). So, an in-trenched status-quo operator *DECIDES the entire world is conformant, as they will imagine, it is computationally secure, these pablums can do whatever and it will not matter a wit to them to me or to anyone; on the other hand, should they conceive of any stepping out of bounds? Well, an opportunity for ‘learning’ to adapt the system to the exigencies of the moment, provide some additional incentives where they may be needed on a concept-basis, and, re-figure it all as co-opted total spectral sweet. And what about ‘war’? Well, that is intrinsic to it, it is all a ‘war’ of untruth on whatever the pab’s might think they think they know about anything; but, truth be the true that that nobody CAN KNOW ANYTHING and history judges on a Marx-criteria.
So, the becoming-of history. A tech-assemblage of newfound parts of cheap construction;----- let’s piece-meal a new version of this town? No, but apparently the dilapidated strip-mall system was for these people total inspiration on the never-ending renewal of capitalism itself(all books there taken literally to a dead-point fact). Which is also the case that their entire approach amounts to writing the future book of histoire on what they KNOW already is the permissiveness to be maintained and respected in the present of the deformed social-base of lost-cause pablum). So, in large-sweep, this approach is descriptive of a totally intransigent status-quotient over-factoring out and across the future the internal intrinsities of ‘freedom’ these scum-suckers already enjoy and, knowing they enjoy it on permission-slipping one-another, find no fault-cause to continue in that vein whenever something ‘comes up, across my desk.’ So, that is defacto resignation on authority, actually; no one can presume to assert control on principles having to do with anything other than empty-placeholdery-ing, because if they cared, for instance, about the quality of a musical-instrument’s output, they wouldn’t build it in either a bespoke YouTube-vetted molded-realityShop of some truly-informant person on the internet making sure the world knows his presumption of qual; nor, in true total fact, would this instrument be made in china as if OWNERSHIP over the quality system itself weren’t somehow intrinsic to the consummation of the fineness of the result(that can only be appreciated under such circumstances of ownershipping geniunuity1./)<-[.]\\\\.
And, on this point, is really where the total break-down on ‘liberalism’ comes because, while it IS interesting what these people have ‘managed’ to come up with vis a vi A TOTAL CONTROL SYTEM;, it is also the case that where this breaks-down is at the point of conceiving************ of the total history to-be-written, output from this system, that must in fact be understood both as hegemonical, on the one hand, and, on the other, as devoid, actually, of any, therefore and thus::::::actuall-insisting/existing----liberal,impulsion. What these people must(to themselves) think these permissiveness-slips accomplish is "creativity"; and, yet, this ‘creativity’ is obviously in these null-void ‘factorationsz’ of these non-entities of a-AUTHOR (it (y ) ) ) ](which does also speak to the stunted view on ‘creation’ and ‘artistry’ these supposed ‘artists’ of economic and cultural-nature(if they aren’t themselves ‘artists’ of ascription of the past on account of their money-making off the pablum::::and this, in brief, pertains on making economical decision-making and polititudinal aversion of faith-based concerns actually SEEM inventive because they lay-off hands on the problem and wink at the girl they could impress for having done that).....So, there’s obviously a gender component to the whole thing just as well..........
Nevertheless, the solution to this impasse that LIBERALISM(as an actual thing, not the dreampt-up nonsense these genuinely uneducated, uninspiring, mobs of geriatric compensation think of in their ‘round-tables’ all across THISworld….); but, the actual thing, actually it is a seemingly contradictory view on understanding cultural production out of true-freedom. And *that*********, that is the realization and total-BELIEF in the fact that, once a system HAS BEEN PUT INTO PLACE, that its products can only be amenable to the public, ACTUALLY, with regard to the specificity that is manifested from without of its ABSOLUTELY unconditionally free-creation 'spot'(on the map)(which the system is meant to be designed to ABSOLUTELY PROTECT). So, the point is, actually****, with liberalism, to always think freedom down to the peon; think up from the peon all the way out and back through; and consider that?Should he be totally free in his non-constrained production he will be capable of yielding ART. AND:::::::once it is KNOWN that a system can produce ART in any and every location, then it is simple BELIEF and FAITH in the system and whatever is necessary to continue to make it work that ensures that it DOES WORK(to that end, which is, as the ‘framers’ KNEW, a never-ending responsibility2 and DUTY TO CARE FOR THE population AS A WHOLE.).
Footnotes
And while, here, it may be argued there are gains to be had from without of the TOTAL CONSOLIDATION into bespoke-CLOWN these people and their underling-'artist'-servants have endeavored to effectuate; it is also the case they cannot constitute any actually creative impulse from without of such a command-and-order on an immediate-time-basis things from dumb-sheep 'MAKERS' that's all the way down to the peon-leve(as is further described below) nothing but PROGRAMMATICAL(with only the 'leader'(like a MUSKITE person) calling shots as a geek to grifting 'artists' as if the entire thusly consummated TROLL(and it is based on both non-knowledge and non-belief in quality measures of all kinds pertaining not-exlusively though but surely and exceptionally to ART and its genre-izationalities-,as if the entire assemblyING of these morons of totalENTITLEMENT were a comedical version of the next-level of Pikkety's economical modelization of history. ↩
And, here, a clear distinction needs to be drawn between what most people in the United States of Mexico actually believe they are doing if they can conceive of doing anything other than endlessly asserting the Declaration of Independence from without each and every one which is NOT FREEDOM in fact, the Framers KNEW THIS, and decided it needs to be a civil-society that will eventually arise from without of this improvised and provisional assemblage of un-authorized state-level ‘constitutionally’ state-hooded STATES. And that means, essentially, that drawing the DECLARATION forward as a ‘liberal’ concept for 250-years WAS NEVER actually the history actually and it is not how the country CAN BE WRITTEN into the future either; what the COUNTRY was, actually, was an endeavor to hand-out as much land to the OIL-companies as possible as soon as it became apparent that ‘manageing’ freedom was TOO DIFFICULT TO comprehend it by generally far-less astute people than the framers certainly believed themselves to be(although they got a good hand in fortune and the CONSTITUTION is, itself, as written, TOTALLY COMPREHENSIVE for a liberalism of free-people despite these people believe it is just the opposite because they look at it as if they are bourgeois aspirants, which is the toxic element in all nation-hood failure, if it can be imagined the United States is so chock-full of this kind of pathetic sick and disgusting person, precisely what ANYONE WITH A BRAIN thinks the country is GREAT ABOUT(and, in fact, once truly was for a brief minute in the 1990s). And what happened to the CULTURE SERIOUS of the 1990s? TOO clear on the market-failure to provide meaning in life; and too unruly to manage like dumb pablum they turned into almost immediately ON JON FAVREAU’s desperate area-level effort to transform this creative efflorescence into a parody of itself as a hegemonic understanding of itself.)///////
<-↩
Furtherance of KNOWlEDdGgEeeee:
What the 'Space Needle' BODED ABOUT THE END OF ARCHITECTURE:::::::