xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Which is to say HIS formulation? NO: his enterprise, as a MARXIST, aesthetetician? YES: it is interesting to HIGHLIGHT the fact thaet, for morethaen a CENTURY, MARXISM, for the petit(and RANCEis for surely in this category of small-landed gentry, LOOKING off into the work-force for citizen aspirants to cling to HISversion of living it HIGH which is how annoying it was for GAUNY(who must've been a first-rate WRITER and POET, actually, to have been archived for a MARXIST fuckin' NIGGER )!-to come creeping in thinking his only smarts was thinking AESthEtics MARXISTICALLY, which is also to say ASPIRATIONtoBecomPart of the BOURGEOISIE?NO:an aristocrat is the true nature of all of this concern for centuries most people have clamoured like cracker?NO: like crazy?NOPE: like they s' life depended on being recognized for the thing they thought they was meant to live for and then been roundly rejected by the PREVAILING 'power authorites', like TOLSTOY was not at all, but the way CHEKHOV was not at al(or maybe THE WAY THAET GAUNCY(ibid). was not EITHER )--but the fact is thaet most of these "marxists" do truly believe in SHORTCUTTING out EXPERTISE, let alone, to say FUCKIN' GENIUS of any kind whatsoever make or model of it,and just aspire on the aestheticalization(or, maybe perhaps aestheticalizationalismticalism) of a 'movement'' of some kind or another which is funny cause I*** DO RATE THIS (in 2025!all things CONSIDERED, but not totally: a total elaboration of an aesthetic-economic ADJUDICARY forthwithcoming......)as a supplemental to the prevailing NOTION*THAET it should all be ascrib-ed to the judgment*(however you want to impoverishmentally understand thaet, cause it is so swahili-COMPLEX--judgment--I DO NOT KNOW WHAT KANT EVEN THOUGHT TO DRAW THE dreary little KIDDIE-LINES out of CRAYOLA he drew in that CRITIQUE OF THE (never say POWER unless you've GUYER looking for the WRONG total understanding of)JUDGment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) of ARISTOCRATS? NO: the top-tier of class is all one can actually say because it is ONLY in RUSSIA and, perhaps, in PRE-revolutionary FRANCE¹!THAET such a CONCEPTever existed on this earth of such 'DIVINE ASPIRATION' ;-) as an artis-to-cr(e)at(which is basically how one shouldunderstand this word to mean it isan ARTIST+an diplomat+a science on discovering which and why and how it is a person learns anything at all about the met*\erial\reality as itSELF AESTHETICAL(which IS!something KANT for sure understood totally and ABSA-fuckin'-LUTELY total and clear nobody thaet does not get that will ever CONCEIVE of his(i.e., Mr. AWESOME, Immanuel M. KANT!'s) TRUE understanding of 'human-nature' which is what most people think he 'focused' on at this point, perhaps; but:::::the truth is thaet(from even a single-cursorilyread reading of this author) HE! DID UNDERSTAND the limits of HUMAN KNOWLEDGE totally as, essentially, phenomenological expertise on life itself, which is whaet most people today may want to wake-up to this idea againabout, cause the future is bright and there's no longer a reason to wonder if RANCIERE rates for this person he does and he did LOVE his 'DEMOCRACY book' even if he no longer cares a fuckin' SHIT ABOUT ITS' THESES on gambling the fuckin' METRIC OF SOCIETY TO DIPSHIT clamour. --RIP marxism as a way to clamour to the aristocratic SUMMIT baby!

#Footnotes