Cinematicity

film & culture

CLOSER(2004), Natalie's FRAME shot and TAKE

Natalie Portman met Damon Wayans once and thought he was fuckin' hilarious but he never once said NIGGER? No, he said it pr ac ly ev y f u h k i n wort. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Natalie Portman met Damon Wayans once and thought he was fuckin' hilarious but he never once said NIGGER? No, he said it pr ac ly ev y f u h k i n wort. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Person-hoodedness is a CONCEPT that no longer pertains on CINEMA because, with the loss of FILM as a substrate there is no longer a plan for action.

And, for anyone that has ANY EXPERIENCE at+all++++++with FILM as a substrata of individualism, that will make a bit more sense because the laugh track on DIGITAL?(that's what 'they call it', the laser-pointer on an black,empty fuckin' screen with 'anti-flicker' anti-judder etc makin' the whole thing? CONTINUOUS TIME.....); what that description does is throw me out of the movie and when a person is THROWN out of a film?The only thing they lose there is the TAKE. Which is to say: with 'digital'? No, it's just a single, continuous-time TAKE and that is why it is no longer appropriate to discuss 'cinema' as if digital would ever.be.able toproduce=a CINEMA image. itself, which is the sense of a fuckin', mother-fuckin' TAKE. The only thing I will withhold from this website ARE actionable material; and, where I COULD GO WITH THIS THOUGHT THAT nobody else will be capable of going--because they DON'T GIVE AN ACTUAL FUCK about anything--other than what could produce a 'digital take', which is the only thing I will never REVEAL to the worth less than garbage Oxford FILM 'depo' they call it cause they are so fuckin' lame they lost all respect ....

so the fact I end this now is because it IS IMPORTANT to save cinema. And, on that point, just realize the BLOWN OPPORTUNITY Natalie Portman had with not casting Jude the STUPID in this role because, I swear to god, the minute***** I thought that was a fuckin' stranger(jude's forlorn face from a distance that is just a regular workin' JOE?! Wow, good on Portman goin' deep as shit on this problem I surmise she landed-up trying to excavate now on her UBER-FAME on men's dick-sockets she called them cause she hated men just like potato chips)::::I said,'this movie with this music and 1990s after-tail is gonna just be fuckin' amazing, I cannot imagine having picked a better actual film tonight to watch in the midst of the mOST rancid demonstration of total disregard for the viewer that is NOT LOOKING FOR PORNO everywhere and anywhere they may be or go as a fuckin' moron on display alone for utter deriliction-consumption', which is what and only what all these girls are as proto-sypiant matter on dick-toggle that means fucking ab-so-LUTE-leee, NOTHING....

And, That Is To Say: what you see in these images of just UBER-sexy(and Natalie below in relief from Jude's asshole characature on wealth is a version of this, but with a brain so much bigger than Jude Loser) are women that can only be explained as VIDEO-GAME girls, for a start, because they are so sexy they don't PERTAIN on any single situation there's nothing going on in the image BUT glamour. And, here, glamour means sycophancy on life as if it were a place for nothing other than exhibitionism and that means I could care less about the image I can appreciate you are super-fuckin' HOT in that photo there with tight rubber up to the place a hand needs to get the fuck in; but, it ain't my hand ever goin' in there and the only hand goin' in there is THE DIGITAL tool++++++made the request to get this whore photographed"quote(cause digital CMOS/CCD don't produce a photo you fools can spend all your life in lightroom with the sliders and grain and effects for filmographicality etc and still not get a STILL FRAME OF nothing, particularly with cross-frame 'noise-reduction' Bezos' little criminal outfit DPREVIEW foisted upon the world to DESTROY Panasonic and Lumix and whatever the name on their lenses was(he had no other interest in his uber-cool life-styling effort than that this company should be totally destroyed--totally--to pull the slide-wool off ??o? and ?a?$,two other+ companies someone mentioned to him once);

in any case, with the loss of a TAKE in this film, PORTMAN don't rate for shit, even though--and this is what is interesting about the film actually::::::::::SHE IS, IN EVERY SINGLE one of them, SEARCHING ANEW FOR AN identity.

(which is super-cool, thank you very much Natalie and the director for reminding anyone with a brain why in the fuck Damon Wayan's was ever famous; cause for most people, while that may NOT BE THE correct person, with that name and those people on IN LIVING COLOR, you'll remember the world was NOT always so totally deadly dearth on personality? No, it was a good fuckin' deal more than that was possible through and in cinema and on television).

The Editor of this website wrote this nice essay for you to read for absolutely fuckin' nothing but your own shame on supporting people with ACTUAL MONEY you stupid losers.